I chose this assignment because it challenged my ability to critically analyze techniques that are persuasive while maintaining ethical considerations. Based on the feedback that I received, I revised the bias and ethical concerns section, and I added terms such as brand bias, and emotional manipulation , and speaking on the misleading implications of the campaign's visuals. I also made sure to refine grammar and clarity throughout my draft. My revision shows my growth in applying precise terms and deeper critical analysis to professional analysis.

I chose this proposal because the improvement of my community is extremely important to me, and the feedback that I received from my professor offered clear ways to strengthen the argument. In my revision, I clarified the problem’s scope, I added specific local partners and funding resources to support the benefits. I also refined the tone to sound a lot more confident by reducing phrases such as “I believe that.” The revisions that I have made show my growth in audience awareness, incorporating feedback for professional clarity, and persuasive writing.

I chose this memo because it challenged me to balance tone, clarity, and conciseness while conveying workplace expectations professionally. In my revision I smoothed out sentence flow, I added headers for readability, and I rephrased sentences that were vague or awkward. The changes that I have made make the memo more polished and a lot easier to scan.

I chose this assignment because it was a solid draft that needed to be polished to meet a professional standard. I revised the introduction for clarity and conciseness, I fixed grammar and sentence flow, and I also improved source credibility evaluation by adding detailed language about objectivity and authority, and I also revised the MLA Works Cited page. My revisions mirror my growth in applying my instructors feedback, refining technical tone, and improving my academic writing style.